Digital vs. traditional: which method makes better dental expanders for kids?

NCT ID NCT07338591

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study will compare three ways of making palatal expanders—a device used to widen the upper jaw—in 36 children aged 8 to 13 with crossbite. The methods are fully traditional (using physical molds), hybrid (physical mold plus digital fabrication), and fully digital (using a 3D scanner). Researchers will measure how well the expander fits, how long the process takes, and how satisfied patients and clinicians are.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
palatal expander fabrication workflow (fully conventional, hybrid, fully digital)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that digital methods produce better-fitting expanders more efficiently, potentially improving comfort and reducing chair time for children needing orthodontic treatment.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 36 participants, so results may not apply broadly. The outcomes focus on workflow and fit, not long-term health benefits.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for TRANSVERSE MAXILLARY DEFICIENCY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • faculty of dentistry , Mansoura university

    Al Mansurah, 35516, Egypt

  • faculty of dentistry , Mansoura university

    Al Mansurah, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.