Dental showdown: which brace works best for Kids' crossbite?

NCT ID NCT07500194

Not yet recruiting Disease control Sponsor: Al-Azhar University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two fixed dental appliances—Quad Helix and Rapid Maxillary Expanders—for treating posterior crossbite in 20 Egyptian children aged 9-12. The goal is to see which device widens the upper jaw more effectively and causes less discomfort. Results could help dentists choose the best option for young patients.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: Quad Helix appliance and Rapid Maxillary Expander (both dental devices)
What this could lead to: If successful, this study could show which device works better and is more comfortable for correcting crossbites in children, improving dental health and quality of life.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage trial with only 20 participants, so results may not apply to all children. The study hasn't started yet, and outcomes depend on patient cooperation.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for MAXILLARY EXPANSION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

MAXILLARY EXPANSION POSTERIOR CROSSBITE TRANSVERSE MAXILLARY DEFICIENCY

Contacts and locations

Locations

Faculty of Dental medicine (boys) ,Cairo,Al-Azhar University

Cairo, Cairo Governorate, 00000, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.