Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Digital precision vs. steady hands: which places orthodontic screws better?

NCT ID NCT07698730

Completed Disease control Sponsor: Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jul 13, 2026 · Last updated Jul 14, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tests whether a custom 3D-printed surgical guide helps dentists place tiny screws in the upper jaw more accurately than the traditional free-hand method. Each participant gets both techniques on opposite sides of their mouth, so the comparison is direct. The goal is to see if digital planning leads to better screw position, stability, and fewer complications during orthodontic treatment.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
CAD/CAM 3D-printed surgical guide
What this could lead to
If digital guides prove more accurate, this could make orthodontic miniscrew placement safer and more predictable, reducing complications and improving treatment success.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 33 participants. The benefits of the guide may not be large enough to justify the extra cost and planning time, and results may not apply to all patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE COMPLICATION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE COMPLICATION

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy

    Can Tho, +84, Vietnam

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.