Pedaling away chemo pain: new study tests cycling as a remedy for nerve damage
NCT ID NCT07150117
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study is testing whether a 12-week supervised cycling program can reduce nerve pain and improve quality of life in 30 adults who have had chemotherapy for cancer. Participants will ride a stationary bike twice a week for up to an hour. The main goal is to see if people find the program acceptable and if a larger trial is worth doing.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- supervised stationary cycling exercise program
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could point toward a simple, drug-free way to reduce nerve pain and improve daily function for cancer survivors.
- What could go wrong
- This is a very small, early proof-of-concept study with only 30 people. It is designed to see if a larger trial is even possible, not to prove the exercise works. Results may not apply to everyone.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ADULTS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Cross Cancer Institute
RECRUITINGEdmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2, Canada
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A good Night's sleep: could a simple program ease Cancer's toll on rest?
- Can a new drug shield nerves from Chemotherapy's side effects?
- Smartwatch could spot nerve damage before it starts
- Could sitting up make radiation therapy more comfortable?
- Can we predict dangerous side effects when combining radiation and immunotherapy?
- Family history as a shield: can culturally tailored guidance cut cancer risk?