New study pits two needle procedures against each other for wrist pain relief
NCT ID NCT07269613
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two minimally invasive treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome: pulsed radiofrequency (using heat pulses) and hyaluronidase hydrodissection (injecting a fluid to free the nerve). About 56 adults with mild to moderate carpal tunnel will be randomly assigned to one of the two procedures. The goal is to see which provides faster and better pain relief and improves hand function.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME (CTS) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Faculty of Medicine Sohag University
Sohag, Sohag Governorate, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can sound waves or nerve glides ease carpal tunnel pain?
- Can a stem-cell wrap boost nerve repair after carpal tunnel surgery?
- Could a common hand condition reveal hidden heart disease? new imaging trial investigates
- Laser light may help heal nerves in carpal tunnel syndrome
- AI mouse could give Pain-Free computing to millions with hand injuries
- Laser or magnets for wrist pain? study pits new therapies against standard care