Heart study: which imaging test leads to better outcomes?
NCT ID NCT07308496
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two imaging methods—CT-FFR and QFR—to see which better guides treatment decisions for people with coronary artery disease. About 1,400 participants with moderate blockages will be randomly assigned to one of the two approaches. The goal is to find out which method reduces the risk of major heart problems like heart attack or death within one year.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Software-Guided heart procedures: a new standard for coronary care?
- Heart patients may stay active longer with coach calls and group support
- Sitting less could be a lifeline for frail hearts – a new trial tests a simple program
- Can balloon timing make or break heart artery success?
- Can we predict which heart aneurysms will grow?
- Can a higher dose of adenosine sharpen heart scans?