Can a sleep machine protect your heart after a stroke?
NCT ID NCT04458779
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looked at whether using a CPAP machine to treat sleep apnea soon after a stroke can improve heart health. 71 people with acute stroke and moderate-to-severe sleep apnea were randomly assigned to CPAP or usual care. Researchers measured changes in heart structure and blood markers over 12 months to see if CPAP reduces the risk of future heart problems or stroke.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) device
- What this could lead to
- If it works, CPAP could help reduce the risk of another stroke or heart problem in people who have both stroke and sleep apnea.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with 71 people, so results may not apply to everyone. CPAP can be uncomfortable and some people may not use it regularly.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
New Taipei City, Taiwan
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Do current sleepiness tests work for kids? a new study puts them to the test
- Remote monitoring may boost sleep apnea therapy adherence
- Could a stent double the chance of a good recovery after severe stroke?
- Could a mouthpiece replace the CPAP machine for sleep apnea?
- Can a robot unlock the Brain's recovery after stroke?
- Can brain scans reveal why stroke disrupts Two-Handed learning?