Heart stent debate: to open or not to open side branches?
NCT ID NCT00914199
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at people with blocked heart arteries that have side branches. Doctors placed a stent in the main artery but did not always open the side branch if blood flow was acceptable. The goal was to see if opening the side branch caused more harm or benefit. About 477 patients took part, and researchers tracked heart-related events like death, heart attack, or need for another procedure.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
477 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Apr 2007
- Finished
-
Nov 2021
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Stable or unstable angina pectoris. -Bifurcation lesion of "LAD/diagonal", "Cx/obtuse marginal", "RCA-- * PDA/posterola¬te¬ral branch" or "LM/Cx/LAD". * Diameter of main vessel by visual estimate \> 2.5 mm. * Diameter of side branch by visual estimate \> 2.25 mm. * Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Age \< 18 years. * ST-elevation infarction within 24 hours. * Expected survival \< 1 year. * S-creatinine \> 200 µmol/l. * Allergy to Aspirin, Clopidogrel or Ticlopidine. * Allergy to Sirolimus.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Coronary artery disease are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
Aarhus, 8200, Denmark
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- SMART-I: SiroMax™ Multi-Center coronary artery lesion treatment - safety and feasibility study of SiroMax SCB in ISR and DNSV
- Hospital-to-Home transitional cardiac rehabilitation as a transition from Centre-Based cardiac rehabilitation after cardiac surgery: a Single-Blind randomised controlled trial
- Opportunistic screening of coronary artery calcium on Non-Gated routine chest CT using artificial intelligence: retrospective external validation and clinical risk stratification
- AI heart scan software aims to spot dangerous blockages without invasive probes
- A shot of nicorandil before stenting might keep blood flowing
- Can personalized breathing settings protect lungs during heart surgery?