Brain training showdown: continuous vs. intermittent feedback in fMRI study

NCT ID NCT07389486

Recruiting now Knowledge-focused Sponsor: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tests whether continuous or intermittent real-time fMRI neurofeedback is better at helping healthy adults control a brain region called the anterior insula, which is involved in emotions and body awareness. Ninety participants will undergo either real or sham neurofeedback while their brain activity is monitored. The goal is to see which feedback style leads to greater brain changes and improvements in empathy and heartbeat perception.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: real-time fMRI neurofeedback training procedure
What this could lead to: If successful, this could point toward more effective brain-training methods for regulating emotions and improving empathy.
What could go wrong: This is an early-stage study in healthy volunteers, not a treatment trial. Results may not apply to clinical populations, and the training effects might be small or temporary.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HEALTHY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

HEALTHY

Contacts and locations

Locations

University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
RECRUITING

Chengdu, Sichuan, 611731, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.