New trial asks: should hospitals watch patients every second after surgery?

NCT ID NCT06232876

Not yet recruiting Knowledge-focused Sponsor: The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study will test whether continuously monitoring vital signs like oxygen levels and heart rate after major surgery can reduce complications compared to standard intermittent checks. About 492 adults having non-cardiac surgery will be randomly assigned to either have their data visible to doctors or hidden. The goal is to see if real-time alerts lead to quicker interventions and better outcomes.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: Continuous vital sign monitoring device (Masimo Radius PPG)
What this could lead to: If it works, this could show that continuous monitoring helps catch problems earlier and reduce serious complications after surgery.
What could go wrong: This is a relatively small, early-stage trial focused on monitoring, not a treatment. The benefits may be modest, and the device could cause false alarms or be impractical on busy wards.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SURGERY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

SURGERY

Contacts and locations

Locations

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.