Back pain breakthrough? study pits two key surgeries against each other
NCT ID NCT07127380
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two minimally invasive spine surgeries (Mini-TLIF and MIDLIF) for people with chronic low back pain from disc disease. 100 adults who haven't improved with other treatments will be randomly assigned to one surgery and followed for a year. The goal is to see which surgery provides better pain relief, fewer complications, and lower costs.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DEGENERATIVE DISC DISEASE (DDD) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Łódź, Poland
RECRUITINGLodz, Łódź Voivodeship, 93-513, Poland
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a Two-Pronged surgical approach beat standard surgery for neck pain?
- Belly fat vs. body mass index: which better predicts spine surgery risks?
- Disc replacement may keep patients working longer than spinal fusion
- Healing protein injection could ease back pain without surgery
- New magnet device could zap away back pain without pills
- Could a simple TENS device ease pain during back procedures?