Which surgery is safer for esophageal cancer? new study compares two techniques
NCT ID NCT04217239
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compared two types of minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer: the Ivor-Lewis and McKeown approaches. Researchers looked at complications, recovery, and long-term results in 272 patients. The goal was to see which method might be safer and more effective for treating lower esophageal and gastroesophageal junction tumors.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ESOPHAGEAL CANCER are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Yunpeng Zhao
Jinan, Shandong, 250033, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a new drug combo revive Immunotherapy's power against resistant tumors?
- A high-tech camera may take the guesswork out of spotting a dangerous surgery complication
- Blood test score may flag High-Risk esophageal surgery patients
- Can surgery for stomach or esophageal cancer cloud the mind?
- Virtual patients could revolutionize cancer drug testing
- Can a pill restore the Body's tumor suppressor to fight multiple cancers?