Which surgery is safer for esophageal cancer? study compares two techniques
NCT ID NCT04217239
First seen Feb 05, 2026 · Last updated Jun 24, 2026 · Updated 21 times
Summary
This study compared two types of minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer: the Ivor-Lewis and McKeown approaches. Researchers looked at complications, recovery, and long-term results in 272 patients. The goal was to see which method might be safer and more effective for treating lower esophageal and junction tumors.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ESOPHAGEAL CANCER are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Yunpeng Zhao
Jinan, Shandong, 250033, China
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.