Which surgery is better for esophageal cancer? new study compares two techniques
NCT ID NCT07182266
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026
Summary
This study looked at over 1,600 people with esophageal cancer to compare two surgical methods: a newer, less invasive technique called IVMTE and a standard approach called VME. Researchers checked how well patients recovered after surgery and how long they lived without the cancer coming back. The goal is to see if one method leads to better outcomes.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If this study shows one surgery is safer or more effective, it could help doctors choose the best approach for esophageal cancer patients.
- What could go wrong
- This is a retrospective study, not a controlled trial, so results may be influenced by patient selection. It does not test a new treatment, only compares existing methods.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
1,661 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jan 2021
- Finished
-
Sep 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
From January 2021 to December 2023, patients with esophageal cancer who received IVMTE or VME were identified from the prospectively maintained esophageal cancer database at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: (I) primary esophageal cancer confirmed by endoscopic biopsy and (II) diagnosed resectable tumors based on positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) according to the International Union Against Cancer Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) Classification (8th edition) Exclusion Criteria: (I) presence of other advanced malignancies, (II) insufficient clinical data, or (III) postoperative follow-up of less than 12 months.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Esophageal cancer are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200000, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a new drug shrink tumors that resist standard care?
- Could the anesthesia used during surgery influence whether esophageal cancer returns?
- Can an oral drug R01 fight advanced lung, stomach, and esophageal cancers?
- A single blood draw to detect five cancers before symptoms appear?
- Can custom vitamin pills fix nutrient gaps after stomach or esophageal cancer surgery?
- Can a new pill boost Immunotherapy's power against advanced tumors?