Which bile duct stone removal method is safer? a large swedish study investigates

NCT ID NCT06817291

First seen Aug 13, 2026 · Last updated Aug 14, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looks at two techniques for removing common bile duct stones found during gallbladder surgery: placing a temporary stent and doing a follow-up ERCP later, versus doing an ERCP immediately during the same operation. Researchers will compare complications within 30 days, such as pancreatitis, bleeding, or infection, using data from a Swedish national registry of over a thousand patients. The goal is to see if one approach leads to fewer problems and a smoother recovery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Laparoscopic endobiliary stent with postoperative ERCP versus intraoperative ERCP
What this could lead to
If one approach proves safer, it could become the preferred standard for treating common bile duct stones during gallbladder surgery, reducing complications and hospital stays.
What could go wrong
This is a retrospective registry study, not a randomized trial, so results may be influenced by patient selection and other factors. Complications like pancreatitis or bleeding remain possible with either approach.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for COMMON BILE DUCT STONES are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital

    Stockholm, Sweden

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.