Spinal stimulation showdown: which waveform eases chronic pain best?

NCT ID NCT03681262

Ongoing Symptom relief Sponsor: Stanford University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two types of spinal cord stimulation—high frequency and burst—for treating chronic back and leg pain. Seven adults who are candidates for spinal cord stimulation will be randomly assigned to one waveform and tracked for at least 36 months. The goal is to see which provides better pain relief and function over the long term, and to test a system that integrates research into routine care.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: spinal cord stimulation device (high frequency or burst waveforms)
What this could lead to: If successful, this could help doctors choose the best spinal cord stimulation waveform for long-term pain relief in patients with chronic back or leg pain.
What could go wrong: This is a very small study (7 participants) and only tests feasibility, so results may not apply to all patients. It does not test a new treatment, just compares existing options.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CHRONIC PAIN are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Chronic Pain chronic pain syndrome

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

CHRONIC PAIN

Contacts and locations

Locations

Stanford Pain Management Center

Redwood City, California, 94063, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.