Which simulator best trains future nurses? study compares High-Tech options
NCT ID NCT07435233
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares three simulation methods—high-fidelity, hybrid, and task-trainers—to see which best helps nursing students learn tracheal aspiration. About 102 first-year nursing students will be tested on knowledge, skills, satisfaction, and confidence. The goal is to find the most effective training approach for this critical procedure.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SIMULATION TRAINING are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Karadeniz Technical University
Trabzon, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Simulated patients, real skills: a new training approach for future nurses
- Can a simulation training reduce stigma in maternity care for substance use disorder?
- First-Person video plus mental rehearsal may speed up learning of lifesaving newborn procedure
- Video simulations could revolutionize medical training
- New injection training module aims to boost safety and confidence in future nurses
- Nursing students train with live actors to master blood pressure monitoring