New study aims to find best way to spot dangerous lung clots
NCT ID NCT07566858
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looks at 50 adults with acute pulmonary embolism (a blood clot in the lungs) to compare different methods used to diagnose and predict outcomes. Researchers will analyze clinical scores, lab tests, and CT scans from patients in various hospital departments. The goal is to find the most reliable tools for early detection and risk assessment. This is an observational study, meaning no new treatments are tested.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACUTE PULMONARY EMBOLISM are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a new device suck out deadly lung clots?
- Blood test ratio may speed up detection of dangerous lung clots
- Blood test may spot hidden heart danger in lung clots
- Quick ultrasound may spot High-Risk PE patients in the ER
- 10,000 blood clot patients enrolled in massive Real-World treatment registry
- Ultrasound inside the lungs could spot deadly clots in ICU patients