Dental filling showdown: bioactive vs. standard materials tested for durability

NCT ID NCT07524842

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares three types of dental fillings—bioactive, nanohybrid, and bulk-fill—for treating cavities between teeth. Sixty adults with at least three cavities will receive each type of filling and be monitored for up to four years. The goal is to see which material holds up best and causes fewer problems over time.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

dental filling materials (bioactive composite, nanohybrid resin composite, bulk-fill resin composite)

What this could lead to

If one material performs better, dentists may have clearer guidance on which filling to use for long-lasting cavity repairs.

What could go wrong

This is a small, early-stage study with only 60 participants. Results may not apply to all patients or tooth types, and long-term durability is still unknown.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DENTAL CARIES are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

dental caries tooth disorder

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.