Which central line technique works best? new study aims to find out
NCT ID NCT05534971
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two techniques for inserting a central venous catheter in adult emergency department patients with shock. Researchers want to see which method leads to higher first-attempt success, fewer complications, and faster completion. 160 participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two techniques.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If one technique proves better, it could lead to safer and faster central line placement in emergencies.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center study comparing procedures, not testing a new drug or cure. Results may not apply to all hospitals or patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SHOCK are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Montefiore
RECRUITINGThe Bronx, New York, 10467, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A new device aims to track the heart's pumping power in the ICU — without invasive tubes
- New pressure test may help doctors give right fluids in shock
- Non-invasive heart monitor tested against standard method in shock patients
- Stool sample may predict survival in ICU patients
- Can a smartphone app and smart blood pressure cuff save heart shock patients?
- Could a vitamin B12 derivative help treat shock?