Which central line technique works best? new study aims to find out

NCT ID NCT05534971

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two techniques for inserting a central venous catheter in adult emergency department patients with shock. Researchers want to see which method leads to higher first-attempt success, fewer complications, and faster completion. 160 participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two techniques.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to

If one technique proves better, it could lead to safer and faster central line placement in emergencies.

What could go wrong

This is a small, single-center study comparing procedures, not testing a new drug or cure. Results may not apply to all hospitals or patients.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SHOCK are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Shock

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • Montefiore

    RECRUITING

    The Bronx, New York, 10467, United States

    Contact