New study tests which cavity removal method saves more teeth
NCT ID NCT07028905
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two cavity removal methods in 144 adults with deep cavities and reversible pulpitis (tooth nerve inflammation that can heal). One method removes all decay, the other leaves some near the nerve. Researchers will check pain, tooth vitality, and X-rays over 12 months, plus examine extracted teeth under a microscope. The goal is to find which approach better preserves tooth health.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DEEP CARIES are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a simple dental procedure save teeth from root canals?
- Can a new cement save teeth with deep decay better than the standard?
- Can a simple dental procedure save teeth with extremely deep cavities?
- Tooth blood test could tell if a root canal is really needed
- Dentists test if decay location determines tooth survival
- Tooth decay study: do symptoms and cavity depth predict treatment success?