Which works better: one antibiotic or two for this superbug?
NCT ID NCT07593547
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looks at 790 adults with S. maltophilia infections, a hard-to-treat bacteria. Researchers will compare patients who got one antibiotic versus those who got a combination, to see which group has fewer deaths within 30 days. The goal is to find the best treatment approach using real-world data.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could help doctors choose the best treatment strategy for S. maltophilia infections, potentially reducing deaths.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational study, not a controlled trial, so results may be influenced by other factors. It does not test a new drug, only compares existing treatments.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BLOODSTREAM INFECTION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Microbiology and Infectious Disease Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
RECRUITINGMadrid, Madrid, 28007, Spain
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- AI could outsmart bacteria: a smarter way to choose antibiotics?
- Could one blood draw be enough to catch dangerous infections?
- A 5-hour test may replace days of waiting for the right antibiotic in blood infections
- Does the setting of care affect whether kids finish their antibiotics?
- Inhaled antibiotics aim to beat pneumonia in ECMO patients
- New antibiotic under the microscope: can it beat superbug infections?