Can a laser microscope match the gold standard for spotting lung cancer during a biopsy?

NCT ID NCT07725510

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jul 24, 2026 · Last updated Jul 24, 2026

Summary

This study compares two methods for quickly analyzing lung tissue samples during a bronchoscopy: confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE), which uses a laser to scan the tissue, and rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), where a cytologist examines cells under a microscope. The goal is to see if CLE can accurately detect cancer in small lung lesions without destroying the tissue, potentially replacing ROSE. Thirty participants with suspicious lung nodules will have their biopsy samples analyzed by both methods, and the results will be checked against the final lab diagnosis.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If CLE proves as accurate as ROSE, it could offer a non-consumptive, real-time diagnostic method for lung biopsies, potentially speeding up diagnosis and preserving tissue for further testing.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 30 participants, so results may not generalize. CLE requires specialized equipment and expertise, which could limit its widespread use.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

About 30 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Jun 2026

Expected to finish

Dec 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

This study will enroll 60 adult participants with newly identified peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) who are scheduled to undergo diagnostic navigational bronchoscopy. The target population consists of patients presenting with solitary or multiple pulmonary nodules or masses ranging from 5 to 50 mm in maximum diameter on computed tomography (CT) imaging, who have a clinical indication for tissue diagnosis. All participants must be surgical candidates fit enough to tolerate flexible bronchoscopy and meet standard pre-procedural coagulation parameters. Pregnant or lactating women, as well as individuals with severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency or uncorrectable coagulopathy, will be excluded to ensure procedural safety. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrollment. The study population is specifically selected to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of novel optical biopsy (CLE) against the current standard (ROSE) in lesions where tissue acquisition

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * (1)Imaging Findings: Presence of a peripheral pulmonary lesion (PPL) measuring 5 to 50 mm in maximum diameter on chest CT scan. (2)Clinical Indication: Patients with a clinical indication for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy and transbronchial biopsy. (3)Consent: Provision of signed and dated written informed consent prior to any study-specific procedures. Exclusion Criteria: * (1)Contraindications to Bronchoscopy: Patients with severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency or any absolute contraindication to flexible bronchoscopy (e.g., severe hypoxemia, unstable angina, or uncontrolled asthma). (2)Coagulopathy: Patients with severe coagulation disorders (e.g., platelets \<50,000/μL, INR \>1.5) not corrected prior to the procedure. (3)Pregnancy/Lactation: Pregnant or lactating women.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLS) are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510163

    RECRUITING

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510100, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.