Can a freezing needle outperform standard biopsy for lung nodules?
NCT ID NCT07772479
First seen Aug 19, 2026 · Last updated Aug 20, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial compares two biopsy techniques for diagnosing peripheral lung nodules: a newer rotational cryobiopsy needle versus the standard automated biopsy needle. About 308 participants with lung nodules (8–30 mm) will undergo CT-guided biopsy with one of the two needles. The study measures how often each method yields a correct diagnosis, the quality and size of the tissue sample, and complication rates. The goal is to determine which approach is more reliable and safer for guiding treatment decisions.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- CassiII rotational core biopsy needle (cryobiopsy) compared with an automated biopsy needle
- What this could lead to
- If the cryobiopsy needle proves more accurate and safer, it could become the preferred method for diagnosing lung nodules, reducing repeat procedures.
- What could go wrong
- This is a comparative study, not a guarantee of superiority. The cryobiopsy needle may not outperform the standard needle, and biopsy procedures carry risks like bleeding or collapsed lung.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 308 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Mar 2025
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2029
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 90 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * If a chest CT scan reveals pulmonary nodules with an unknown nature, a biopsy is required for definitive diagnosis; if the chest CT shows multiple pulmonary nodules, one of these nodules should be selected as the target lesion; * Axial chest CT imaging demonstrates peripheral pulmonary nodules located in the pulmonary region, with diameters ranging from 8 mm to 30 mm; ③Voluntarily undergo CT-guided lung puncture biopsy and meet all preoperative requirements; ④Participants demonstrate good compliance, are able to cooperate with the study observations, are fully informed about the study's objectives and methods, acknowledge the potential risks, agree to participate in the study, and sign the informed consent form. Exclusion Criteria: * Severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction; * Irreversible coagulation disorders; * Suspected vascular lesions or arteriovenous malformations (assessed by contrast-enhanced CT), or presence of bronchial artery penetration at the planned biopsy site, or suspected pulmonary metastasis from renal cell carcinoma, indicating a high risk of hemorrhage; * PET-CT findings indicate a malignant pulmonary nodule; surgical evaluation may prioritize surgical intervention for the patient; * Pregnant or lactating women; ⑥ Patients with psychiatric disorders or those unable to cooperate during the puncture procedure; ⑦ Presence of anesthesia contraindications; allergy to anesthetic agents; or a history of multiple severe allergies or hereditary allergies; * If the participant has participated in other studies within the past three months without withdrawing or completing those studies, this will affect the observation of the present study; ⑨ Refusal to participate in this study, unwillingness to accept the follow-up protocol, or other circumstances in which the investigator deems the participant unsuitable for participation in this study.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLS) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Beijing Chaoyang Hospital
Beijing, Chaoyang, 100020, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can one needle biopsy and freeze lung nodules in a single visit?
- AI texts may nudge patients with High-Risk lung nodules toward timely care
- Which comes first? a trial tests the best sequence for lung nodule biopsies.
- Can a CT-Free navigation system pinpoint lung nodules with precision?
- AI showdown: three computer models battle to predict lung cancer from CT scans
- Can a laser microscope match the gold standard for spotting lung cancer during a biopsy?