Chilling the body to save the lungs: new trial for ARDS
NCT ID NCT04545424
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Sep 09, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study tests whether gently cooling the body (to 34-35°C) combined with muscle-paralyzing drugs can help people with severe lung injury (ARDS) recover. About 340 adults on ventilators will be randomly assigned to cooling plus paralytics or usual care. The main goal is to see if cooling increases the number of days alive and off a ventilator within 28 days.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- therapeutic hypothermia (cooling blankets or gel-pads) and neuromuscular blocking agents (paralytics)
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could point toward a new treatment that helps ARDS patients recover faster and spend less time on a ventilator.
- What could go wrong
- This is an early Phase 2 trial, so results may not be conclusive. Cooling can cause shivering, which requires deep sedation and paralysis, and the added risks of those drugs must be weighed.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 2
Tests whether the treatment actually works, and watches for side effects, in a larger group.
- Participants
-
About 340 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Jun 2021
- Expected to finish
-
Sep 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 85 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. endotracheal tube or tracheostomy in place and mechanically ventilated for ≤7 days; 2. admitted to a participating ICU 3. radiologic evidence of bilateral pulmonary infiltrates not fully explained by pleural effusions, atelectasis, or hydrostatic pulmonary edema 4. P/F ratio ≤200 with PEEP ≥8 cm H2O; If ABG values are not available, the P/F ratio may be inferred from SpO2 values based on Table 3 from Brown et al as long as following conditions are met: 1. SpO2 values are 80-96% 2. SpO2 is measured ≥10 min after any change in FIO2 3. PEEP is ≥ 8 cm H2O 4. the pulse oximeter waveform tracing is adequate 5. the qualifying inferred P/F ratio is confirmed 1-6h after initial determination. 5. access to an LAR to provide consent. 6. Criteria 3 AND 4 must be met within 72h of enrollment and randomization, not be fully explained by hydrostatic pulmonary edema, and must have occurred within 7 days of exposure to an ARDS-risk factor (including continuous exposure to persistent processes (e.g. sepsis, pneumonia, COVID-19). * Patients may be enrolled and decision about randomization delayed if all criteria other than P/F ratio ≤ 200 are met and then randomized if and when the P/F ratio ≤200 (as long as this occurs within 72h of randomization). Patients on high flow nasal oxygen or non-invasive pressure ventilation may be consented if they meet criteria for starting the 72h ARDS window but may not be enrolled and randomized until they are intubated. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Missed moderate-severe ARDS window (\>72hrs) - Window starts when patient is intubated with a qualifying P/F ratio of ≤ 200 with PEEP ≥ 8 cm H2O or on high flow nasal oxygen with well-fitting nasal cannula with flow ≥ 40 LPM and FiO2 ≥ 0.65 or on non-invasive pressure ventilation with PEEP ≥ 8 cm H2O and FiO2 ≥ 0.6. 2. Missed NMB window: (\>48 hrs) 3. Missed mechanical ventilation window (\>7 days) 4. Refractory hypotension (continuous infusion of \>0.3 mcg/kg/min of norepinephrine or equivalent dose of other vasopressors within 2 hours prior to randomization) 5. Core temperature \<35°C for ≥6 hours while not receiving CRRT on day of randomization 6. Significant, active bleeding (\>3u blood products and/or surgical/IR intervention) on day of randomization 7. Platelets \<10K/mm3 (uncorrected) on day of randomization 8. Active hematologic malignancy and not expected to survive 6 months 9. Skin process that precludes cooling device 10. Moribund, not likely to survive 72h 11. Pre-morbid condition makes it unlikely that patient will survive 28 days 12. Do Not Resuscitate status at time of randomization (excluding patients receiving full support EXCEPT CPR for cardiac arrest) 13. Not likely to remain intubated for ≥48h 14. Physician of record unwilling to participate 15. Severe underlying lung disease 1. Needs \> 2 LPM or \>28% continuous home O2 (adjusted for altitude) 2. On BIPAP (except for OSA) 3. Prior lung transplantation 16. Pregnant at time of randomization 17. BMI consistently \>50 kg/m2 18. Known NYHA class IV heart disease 19. Acute Coronary Syndrome (MI, unstable angina) within 30 days of randomization 20. Cardiac arrest within 30 days of randomization with sequelae likely to increase mortality and/or time to ventilator liberation. 21. Burns over \>20% of the body surface 22. Severe chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh score 12-15) 23. Previously randomized in CHILL study 24. Simultaneous enrollment in another inpatient interventional trial started during the current hospitalization. 25. On ECMO during the current hospitalization.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute respiratory distress syndrome are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Brooke Army Medical Center
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, 78234, United States
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
-
Cleveland Clinc
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
-
Cooper Health System
Camden, New Jersey, 08103, United States
-
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
-
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
-
Intermountain Healthcare (Utah)
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States
-
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
-
Loyola University Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60660, United States
-
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
-
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
-
Temple University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140, United States
-
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
-
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States
-
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States
-
University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
-
University of Pennsylavia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
-
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States
-
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can adjusting breathing effort during ventilation improve lung function in ARDS?
- Can tracking ambulance ventilators improve emergency breathing care?
- Which steroid best fights ARDS? a Head-to-Head trial aims to find out
- Inhaled DNA-buster may shield trauma patients from lung failure
- Three blood markers may flag who develops lung failure after chest injury
- Can a Radiation-Free scan reveal how ARDS treatments reshape lung blood flow?