12,500 cancer patients studied: which heart attack strategy saves more lives?

NCT ID NCT06702436

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This completed study looked at 12,500 cancer patients who had a type of heart attack called NSTEMI. Researchers compared those who got invasive procedures like angiography versus those treated only with medications. The goal was to see which approach led to fewer deaths in the hospital and shorter stays.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to

If the results show a clear benefit of one strategy, it could guide doctors in choosing the best heart attack treatment for cancer patients.

What could go wrong

As an observational study, it cannot prove cause and effect. Differences in patient health or cancer type may influence outcomes, not just the treatment chosen.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CANCER are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

acute subendocardial myocardial infarction cancer myocardial infarction neoplasm Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital

    Ankara, Ankara, 06200, Turkey (Türkiye)