Which bypass graft lasts longer? a Head-to-Head test

NCT ID NCT07796750

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Sep 01, 2026 · Last updated Sep 02, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looks at two ways to perform coronary artery bypass grafting, a surgery that reroutes blood around blocked heart arteries. One method uses a single chest artery for the graft, while the other uses both chest arteries. Researchers will compare long-term survival, stroke risk, and wound complications in 666 adults who had first-time bypass surgery. The goal is to see whether using both arteries offers better outcomes than the standard single-artery approach.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting compared with single internal thoracic artery (SITA) grafting during coronary artery bypass surgery
What this could lead to
If BITA grafting proves safer and more durable, it could become the preferred standard for bypass surgery, improving long-term survival and reducing repeat procedures.
What could go wrong
This is a retrospective review, not a randomized trial, so hidden differences between groups could skew results. BITA grafting may also raise the risk of sternal wound infections, especially in certain patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

666 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jan 2024

Finished

Jun 2026

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

Adult patients undergoing first-time isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in whom at least two coronary artery grafts were performed. Patients undergoing a single coronary artery graft were excluded.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18 years or older. * First-time isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. * At least two coronary artery grafts performed. * Surgery performed between May 1, 2017 and October 31, 2025. * Complete information regarding surgical grafting strategy. * Available follow-up. Exclusion Criteria: * Previous coronary artery bypass grafting. * Single coronary artery graft only. * Concomitant cardiac surgical procedures. * Missing information regarding arterial grafting strategy. * Missing follow-up data. * Missing essential baseline variables preventing propensity score estimation.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Coronary artery bypass grafting are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin

    Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.