Which drainage method is easier on patients? new study compares two procedures

NCT ID NCT04857424

Completed Symptom relief Sponsor: Mayo Clinic Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study looked at 121 patients with blocked bile ducts (biliary obstruction) to see which drainage method—endoscopic (through a scope) or percutaneous (through the skin)—led to a better quality of life. Researchers measured changes in mobility, self-care, pain, and anxiety. The goal is to help doctors choose the procedure that causes less discomfort and improves daily living.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: drainage procedure (endoscopic or percutaneous)
What this could lead to: If successful, this could help doctors choose the drainage method that best preserves patients' quality of life.
What could go wrong: This is a completed observational study, not a treatment trial. It compares existing procedures, so it won't introduce a new therapy. Results may not apply to all patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BILIARY OBSTRUCTION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

cholestasis

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

BILIARY OBSTRUCTION

Contacts and locations

Locations

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.