Personalized vs. standard back pain rehab: which works better for seniors?

NCT ID NCT07699419

First seen Jul 13, 2026 · Last updated Jul 14, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two types of physical therapy for adults aged 60 and older with chronic low back pain. One approach tailors exercises to each person's specific physical problems, while the other uses a standard program to improve overall function. The goal is to see which method is more practical and effective for reducing pain and improving daily activities.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
physical therapy (impairment-based treatment or functional restoration program)
What this could lead to
If one approach proves better, it could lead to more effective, personalized rehabilitation for older adults with chronic back pain.
What could go wrong
This is a small feasibility study with only 18 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The trial tests practicality, not yet effectiveness.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN (CLBP) are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • Recovery City Clinic

    Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.