Which video laryngoscope wins the race to place a breathing tube?
NCT ID NCT07577648
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two types of video laryngoscopes (Astra-Vue and C-MAC D-Blade) to see which one helps doctors place a breathing tube faster and more easily in adults having surgery under general anesthesia. About 60 adults aged 18 to 70 will take part. The main goal is to measure the total time needed to insert the tube, along with success rates and any complications.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AIRWAY MANAGEMENT are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Universiti Malaya Medical Centre
Petaling Jaya, Kuala Lumpur, 59100, Malaysia
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a nasal cannula outperform a face mask in keeping patients oxygenated during emergency intubation?
- Could a simple valve make manual ventilation safer during surgery?
- Scope-Guided tube swap may cut time without oxygen
- Video-Assisted airway device may improve First-Attempt intubation success
- Which intubation tool works best? trial puts three devices Head-to-Head
- Manikin study tests if a new airway device helps novices intubate blindly