AI vs. surgeons: who reads brain oxygen better?

NCT ID NCT07654244

Not yet recruiting Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Antalya Health Sciences University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study will test whether artificial intelligence programs like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot can interpret brain oxygen monitoring data as accurately as experienced clinicians during open heart surgery. Researchers will compare responses from AI tools and two doctors for 63 elective heart surgery patients. The goal is to see how close AI comes to clinical expertise, not to treat or cure any condition.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to: If successful, this could show that AI can reliably help doctors interpret brain oxygen levels during surgery, potentially improving patient safety.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage study (63 participants) that only compares AI responses to clinicians' interpretations. It does not test whether AI actually improves patient outcomes, and results may not apply to all surgeries or AI tools.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CARDIAC SURGERY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

CARDIAC SURGERY CLINICAL SUITABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS NEAR-INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY

Contacts and locations

Locations

Antalya Training and Researching hospital

Antalya, Muratpaşa, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.