AI reads brain tumor types from routine slides, no special stains needed
NCT ID NCT07685301
First seen Jul 06, 2026 · Last updated Jul 07, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study develops an artificial intelligence model that can classify brain tumors into categories, families, and specific diagnoses using only standard stained tissue slides. Researchers will train the AI on 20,000 archived images from two hospitals and test its accuracy against known diagnoses. If it works, the AI could speed up diagnosis and reduce reliance on expensive molecular testing.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this AI model could help pathologists diagnose brain tumors faster and more accurately from routine slides, potentially reducing the need for additional molecular tests.
- What could go wrong
- This is a retrospective observational study using existing data, so the AI's performance in real-time clinical use is unknown. The model may not generalize well to other hospitals or patient populations.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 20,000 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Aug 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Jul 2029
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
The study population consists of pediatric (≥9) and adult patients of any sex who underwent neurosurgical resection or biopsy for a suspected central nervous system (CNS) tumor at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2025, and who have an available postoperative pathological diagnosis, archived hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) stained slides and/or digital whole-slide images, and sufficient linked de-identified clinical, pathological, and molecular data for retrospective analysis. The cohort includes patients with primary or secondary CNS tumors for whom routine clinical care generated pathology materials suitable for computational pathology analysis.
- Ages
-
9 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients who underwent brain or spinal tumor resection or biopsy at Huashan Hospital Fudan University and Shandong Provincial Hospital. 2. Postoperative pathology diagnosis consistent with a primary or secondary central nervous system tumor. 3. Availability of archived routine H\&E-stained glass slides or existing digital whole-slide image files of adequate quality for analysis. 4. Availability of essential de-identified clinical and pathological information, including age, sex, tumor location, and key surgical/pathology records. 5. Use of archived data and samples permitted under institutional ethics approval, including waiver of informed consent where applicable. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Severe slide preparation or scanning artifacts that preclude meaningful computational analysis, including extensive tissue folding, severe bubbles, severe detachment, markedly uneven staining/fading, or severe out-of-focus scanning. 2. Insufficient viable tumor tissue or insufficient analyzable tumor area for patch extraction. 3. Missing or uncertain pathological diagnosis that cannot be reliably reassigned according to the WHO 2021 CNS tumor classification using available records. 4. Cases lacking sufficient clinical, pathological, or molecular information required for core study analyses. 5. Other cases determined by the investigators to be unsuitable for algorithm training or evaluation after quality control review.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Brain tumors are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a smart platform ease the toll of childhood cancer on families?
- Can a Two-Drug combo outsmart returning childhood cancers?
- Brain surgeons pinpoint the 'Arrival Time' region during awake operations
- New CT tech could sharpen brain tumor images
- New PET scan method aims to outsmart brain tumor comebacks
- Single dose of methadone may ease pain after brain surgery