AI vs. embryologist: who picks the best embryo?
NCT ID NCT07187934
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares an AI algorithm (iDAScore) to human embryologists in ranking embryos for IVF. About 1,325 patients will have their embryos ranked either by the AI or by a specialist, then transferred one by one until a pregnancy is achieved. The goal is to see if the AI can match the embryologist's accuracy, potentially making the process faster and more consistent.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- AI algorithm (iDAScore)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that AI can reliably rank embryos for IVF, potentially reducing the time and cost of fertility treatments.
- What could go wrong
- This is an early-stage study comparing AI to human judgment, and it may not prove that AI leads to better pregnancy rates. The AI might not work as well for all patient groups.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PREGNANCY are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Brussels IVF, UZ Brussel
RECRUITINGBrussels, Brussels Capital, 1090, Belgium
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a class tame pregnancy stress at the genetic level?
- A nationwide test: do home visits build healthier families?
- Can a simple calcium tablet help prevent postpartum bleeding?
- Can AI read ultrasound sweeps to tell Baby's position?
- Could a smart ring unlock secrets of pregnancy health?
- Could Video-Led pelvic exercises redefine prenatal care?