AI coaching boosts student writing in new study
NCT ID NCT07618819
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tests whether one session of AI-assisted structured guidance can improve the quality of narrative literature reviews written by medical postgraduate students. 102 students will be randomly assigned to either receive the guidance session or use AI freely without it. The quality of their final reviews will be compared using a standard scoring scale.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- AI-Assisted Structured Guidance
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could point toward a simple, scalable way to improve medical students' academic writing skills.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small educational study, not a clinical treatment trial. The benefit may be modest or not apply to other settings or student groups.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AI-ASSISTED ACADEMIC WRITING are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can AI help doctors better care for Two-Spirit métis patients?
- Can Hands-On hospital training beat online learning for future cardiologists?
- Teaching AI to doctors: a new way to build trust?
- AI simulated patients could revolutionize medical History-Taking training
- Remote coaching via head-mounted device may boost ultrasound training
- Video simulations could revolutionize medical training