Can personalized recall timing boost word learning in kids with DLD?

NCT ID NCT06995014

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early This study
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Sep 02, 2026 · Last updated Sep 03, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study explores whether tailoring when children with developmental language disorder (DLD) practice recalling new words can improve their learning. Researchers compare a standard fixed schedule to an adaptive one that adjusts to each child's progress. Four- and five-year-olds with DLD learn novel nouns and are tested on recall and recognition shortly after and one week later. The goal is to see if the adaptive approach leads to better word retention.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Behavioral intervention comparing adaptive vs. standard retrieval practice schedules for word learning
What this could lead to
If adaptive retrieval helps children with DLD learn words better, it could lead to more effective speech therapy techniques.
What could go wrong
This is a small early study with only 7 children, so results may not apply broadly. The intervention is behavioral and may not produce lasting gains.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

7 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Aug 2024

Finished

Dec 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

48 to 71 months

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * a significant deficit in language ability (language test score below cutoff for best sensitivity/specificity) or documented age-appropriate language ability. * normal hearing. * no evidence of neurological damage or disease. * scores on tests of nonverbal intelligence above the intellectual disability range * not within Autistic range on Autism screening test * native English speaker (can be bilingual) Exclusion Criteria: * failed hearing screening * known neurological damage or disease * scores on tests of nonverbal intelligence below the intellectual disability range (standard score less than 75) * autism spectrum disorder * non-native English speaker

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Developmental language disorder are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Purdue University

    West Lafayette, Indiana, 47907, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.