Which fixation method best heals a reconstructed ACL?

NCT ID NCT07753707

First seen Aug 07, 2026 · Last updated Aug 07, 2026

Summary

This trial compares three methods of securing a new anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft to the shinbone during knee reconstruction surgery. Adults with a complete ACL tear who receive a hamstring tendon graft will be randomly assigned to one of the fixation techniques. The study uses imaging and knee function scores to see which method leads to better bone-to-graft healing, graft maturation, and overall knee stability.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Three tibial fixation methods for ACL reconstruction: a bioabsorbable interference screw sized to the tunnel, a screw one millimeter larger, and a screw plus a cortical button.
What this could lead to
If one fixation method proves superior, it could refine ACL surgery to improve graft healing and knee stability, potentially reducing re-rupture rates.
What could go wrong
This is a single trial with a modest sample size, and results may not apply to all patients. Differences between methods might be small, and long-term outcomes beyond one year are not assessed.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACL - ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RUPTURE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Hospital Universitario Dexeus

    Barcelona, BARCELONA, 08028, Spain

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.