Heart ablation shows promise for congenital heart patients
NCT ID NCT07574931
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looked at how well a procedure called catheter ablation works for treating fast heart rhythms in people with congenital heart disease. Researchers treated 40 patients and followed them for one year to see if the abnormal heart rhythm came back. The goal was to understand how effective this treatment is in this specific group.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- catheter ablation
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could confirm that catheter ablation is a good option for controlling fast heart rhythms in people with congenital heart disease.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed observational study with only 40 patients. Results may not apply to everyone, and the procedure carries standard risks like bleeding or infection.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ABLATION OF ARRHYTHMIAS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Cairo university hospitals
Cairo, 11956, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Heart surgery in childhood: a hidden impact on speech and memory?
- A website designed to steer teens with heart defects away from vaping
- AI stethoscope aims to spot hidden heart and lung problems in children
- Can community hospitals in zambia master severe disease care?
- App-Based exercise program aims to strengthen hearts in congenital disease
- Which nerve block eases Children's heart surgery pain better?