Which monitor saves more lives in septic shock? new study reveals clues
NCT ID NCT07162857
First seen Sep 30, 2025 · Last updated May 23, 2026 · Updated 28 times
Summary
This study tested two ways to guide fluid treatment in 60 emergency department patients with septic shock: critical care ultrasound and noninvasive cardiac output monitoring. Both groups also received standard sepsis care. The goal was to see which method helps doctors give the right amount of fluids faster, improve survival, and reduce complications like lung or kidney injury. Results will help choose the best monitoring tool for personalized fluid management.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SEPTIC SHOCK are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Locations
-
Panyu Central Hospital Affiliated to Guangzhou Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, China
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.