Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Which monitor saves more lives in septic shock? new study reveals clues

NCT ID NCT07162857

First seen Sep 30, 2025 · Last updated May 23, 2026 · Updated 28 times

Summary

This study tested two ways to guide fluid treatment in 60 emergency department patients with septic shock: critical care ultrasound and noninvasive cardiac output monitoring. Both groups also received standard sepsis care. The goal was to see which method helps doctors give the right amount of fluids faster, improve survival, and reduce complications like lung or kidney injury. Results will help choose the best monitoring tool for personalized fluid management.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SEPTIC SHOCK are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Panyu Central Hospital Affiliated to Guangzhou Medical University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, China

Conditions

Explore the condition pages connected to this study.