Can two doctors get the same ultrasound reading? small study tests reliability in breathing emergencies
NCT ID NCT01743105
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at whether two different doctors can get the same diaphragm measurements using ultrasound in patients with severe breathing problems in the emergency room. 26 adults with acute respiratory distress were each scanned twice by two separate investigators. The goal was to see if the technique is reproducible, not to test any treatment.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
26 people
The number who actually took part.
- Start date
-
Aug 2013
- Finished
-
Jan 2014
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent * The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan * The patient has acute respiratory distress defined by a respiratory rate \> 25, and / or signs of struggle and hypoxia, oxygen saturation (SpO2) \<90% and / or pH \<7.35 and carbon dioxide partial pressure (pCO2) \> 6 kPa (45 mm Hg) * The patient breathes spontaneously (no respirator) Exclusion Criteria: * The patient is participating in another study * The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study * The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship * The patient or his/her representative refuses to sign the consent * It is impossible to correctly inform the patient, or to correctly inform his/her representative * The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding * The patient has a neurological or neuromuscular disease that modifies diaphragm function/movement; this does not include cases of decompensation (polyradiculoneuropathy, Lou Gehrig's disease, Myasthenia ...). * Patient admitted with respiratory support treatment in progress * Patient admitted with respiratory failure requiring immediate implementation of mechanical ventilation, thus preventing ultrasound measurements
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute respiratory distress are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
CHU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
Nîmes, Gard, 30029, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Bedside ultrasound may reveal hidden diaphragm weakness in older patients struggling to breathe
- Can tracking ambulance ventilators improve emergency breathing care?
- Inhaled DNA-buster may shield trauma patients from lung failure
- Which breathing support works best after extubation? small study investigates
- Which breathing aid works best for kids? new study compares HVNI and CPAP
- Experimental cell therapy takes on COVID-19 lung crisis