Are doctors missing hidden cancer clues? new study investigates
NCT ID NCT07345273
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looks at whether doctors are properly reporting small cancer spots called tumor deposits in people with rectal cancer. These spots can show if the cancer is more aggressive and might need extra treatment like chemo or radiation. Researchers will compare reports from before and after 2018, when new guidelines were introduced, to see if reporting has improved.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 225 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Feb 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
May 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Patients (\>16 years old) with primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum who have undergone resectional surgery
- Ages
-
16 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum (proven by biopsy) 2. Undergone surgical resection between 01st January 2007 to 31st December 2017 inclusive for the TNM 5 cohort 3. Undergone surgical resection between 01st January 2022 to 31st December 2024 inclusive for the TNM 8 cohort 3\. Staging with MRI reports are available 4. Post-operative pathology report available 5. Patients aged 16 years and over Exclusion Criteria: 1. Synchronous metastatic tumours 2. Under the age of 16 years 3. MRI and/or pathology reports are not available
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Rectal adenocarcinoma are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
4 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital
Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, United Kingdom
-
Croydon Health Services NHS Trusts
Croydon, Select Your County, CR7 7YE, United Kingdom
-
Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust
Surrey Quays, SM5 1AA, United Kingdom
-
London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust
London, Select Your County, NW10 7NS, United Kingdom
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- New injectable drug tested against Hard-to-Treat solid tumors
- Could a nasal tube replace a temporary ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery?
- Blood test aims to catch Cancer's return earlier
- Blood test guides immunotherapy for hidden cancer cells
- Can Pre-Surgery radiation stop rectal cancer from returning?
- Can a counseling program restore intimacy after rectal cancer?