Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Virtual checkups after surgery: just as good as the real thing?

NCT ID NCT07420114

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Aug 11, 2026 · Updated 5 times

Summary

This study will compare patient satisfaction between telehealth (video or phone) and in-person follow-up visits after minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. About 100 women will be randomly assigned to one of the two follow-up methods. The goal is to see if virtual visits are as satisfying as traditional clinic visits, which could save patients time and travel.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that telehealth follow-up is just as satisfying as in-person visits, potentially making postoperative care more convenient and cost-effective.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study focused on satisfaction, not safety or long-term outcomes. Results may not apply to all surgeries or patient groups.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

About 100 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Jul 2026

Expected to finish

Dec 2026

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

Women over the age of 18 and scheduled for a minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (laparoscopic or robotic surgeries including: excision of endometriosis, adnexal surgery with oophorectomy or cystectomy, myomectomy, or hysterectomy.)

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Participant has provided written informed consent. 2. Women over the age of 18. 3. Ability for patients to complete telehealth visits (i.e. working telephone or internet access) and speak and understand English. 4. Laparoscopic or robotic surgeries including: excision of endometriosis, adnexal surgery with oophorectomy or cystectomy, myomectomy, and hysterectomy. 5. Undergoing minimally invasive gynecologic surgeries with complex pelvic surgeons (AAGL fellowship-trained). Exclusion Criteria: 1. Conversion to open surgery. 2. Malignancy noted intraoperatively or on final pathology evaluation. 3. Surgeon or patient preference for in person clinic follow up. 4. Pregnancy - pregnancy tests will be completed as part of routine preoperative care on the day of surgery

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Endometriosis are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    2 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • UChicago Medicine Advent Hinsdale

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    Hinsdale, Illinois, 60521, United States

  • University of Chicago

    RECRUITING

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.