Short implants could simplify tooth replacement
NCT ID NCT04237545
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jul 29, 2026 · Updated 5 times
Summary
This study tested whether shorter dental implants work as well as standard-length ones for replacing missing back teeth. 106 adults received either a short or standard implant and were followed for 4 years. The goal was to see if the short implants kept bone stable and stayed securely in place.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- T3 short dental implant (device)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could offer a less invasive option for replacing missing back teeth, potentially avoiding the need for bone grafting.
- What could go wrong
- This is a completed study with 106 participants, so results are limited in size. Short implants may not be as stable as standard ones in all patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
106 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2019
- Finished
-
Jul 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients of either sex and at least 18 years of age 2. Patients for whom a decision has already been made to use a dental implant for the restoration of existing partial edentulism in the posterior mandible or maxilla. 3. Prior extracted sites (at least 4 months after extraction) preferred; immediate extractions allowed 4. Splinting to a natural tooth is allowed for the short length (test) implants 5. Intact buccal table as verified by CBCT or during surgery. If absent, patient should be excluded from enrollment in the study. 6. Presence of opposing dentition (antagonist) that will allow for functional occlusion. 7. The site intended for implant placement should have a minimum amount of keratinized gingiva of 2mm and a sufficient vertical bone height (8 - 10 mm in the maxilla; 10mm in the mandible); a short implant (as determined by randomization) will be placed without the need for augmentation except for minor dehiscence, which can be augmented with autogenous bone chips to improve soft tissue attachment. If site was randomized to long length implant (control) (with a minimum of 8mm vertical bone height in the maxilla or less than 10 mm in the mandible) it will have simultaneous augmentation procedure (sinus elevation in the maxilla; vertical ridge augmentation in the mandible). 8. The site intended for implant placement should have approximately 1.5mm buccal-lingual distance on each side in order to allow for wide platform implant (5 and 6mm diameter). 9. Patients must be physically able to tolerate conventional surgical and restorative procedures. 10. Patients who provide a signed informed consent 11. Patients who agree to be evaluated for each study visit. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with known systemic diseases such as uncontrolled diabetes, endocrine disease, heart disease, immuno-compromised, or mental disorders. 2. Patients with current use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, bisphosphonates or corticosteroid treatments. 3. Patients with active infection or severe inflammation in the areas intended for treatment. 4. Patients with a \> 10 cigarette per day smoking habit. 5. Patients with a history of therapeutic radiation to the head or jaw. 6. Patients receiving other dental treatment(s) during the study that could have a negative impact on the healing phase of the study treatment sites. 7. Patients who are known to be pregnant at the screening visit or planning to become pregnant within 6 months of study enrollment. 8. Patients with evidence of severe parafunctional habits such as bruxing or clenching. 9. Patients who have previously failed dental implants at the site intended for study implant placement 10. Patients with HIV or Hepatitis infection 11. Patients with a history of generalized severe chronic periodontal disease
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Edentulous jaw are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Dr. Jordi Gargallo
Tarragona, Catalonia, 43002, Spain
-
Dr. Stefano Sivolella
Padova, 35127, Italy
-
Dr. Suheil Boutros
Dearborn Heights, Michigan, 48127, United States
-
Dr. Xiaozhe Han
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Your phone could map dental implants as well as a tablet
- Can digital scans beat molds for perfect dental implant fit?
- Can a slimmer dental implant handle immediate chewing pressure?
- Can digital scanners perfectly capture the toothless jaw?
- New scan ladder technique tested for stronger dental implants
- Phone scans vs. dental scanners: a new contender for implant impressions?