New scan ladder technique tested for stronger dental implants
NCT ID NCT07662590
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looked at how well full-arch dental restorations made from monolithic zirconia hold up when placed using a special digital scanning tool called a scan ladder. Twenty-five completely edentulous patients received implant-supported restorations and were followed for one year to check for any mechanical problems or failures. The goal was to see if this digital workflow leads to fewer complications.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- scan ladder (horizontal scan body device)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this approach could improve the fit and durability of full-arch dental implants, reducing the need for repairs or replacements.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, retrospective case series with only 25 patients and a short 1-year follow-up, so results may not apply broadly. Mechanical complications like fractures or loosening are possible.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
25 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Dec 2024
- Finished
-
Jun 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
40 to 70 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * \- Any completely edentulous patient (mandible) with an old satisfactory denture requiring an implant-supported restoration. * Patients aged from 40 to 70, able to sign an informed consent will be considered eligible for this trial. * Implant sites must allow the placement of four implants. * Non- heavy Smokers will be included (smoking up to 10 cigarettes/day) * In case of post-extractive sites, they must have been healed for at least 3-month before being treated in the study. * Patients with no systemic condition that may interfere with implant placement (e.g., Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients, patients under treatment of intravenous amino-bisphosphonates) Exclusion Criteria: * \- Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation. * Pregnancy or nursing. * Drug abusers. * Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations. * Patients with infection and or inflammation in the area intended for implant placement. * Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol cannot be properly adhered to. * Patients with signs of hyperactive muscles.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Edentulous jaw are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Dr. M.G. Perio and implant center
Cairo, Maadi, 11270, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Your phone could map dental implants as well as a tablet
- Can digital scans beat molds for perfect dental implant fit?
- Can a slimmer dental implant handle immediate chewing pressure?
- Can digital scanners perfectly capture the toothless jaw?
- Phone scans vs. dental scanners: a new contender for implant impressions?
- Jaw bone graft showdown: which material works best for dental implants?