Jawbone graft showdown: which material works best for dental implants?
NCT ID NCT07608744
First seen May 29, 2026 · Last updated Jun 14, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study tested two types of bone graft materials (alloplastic and xenograft) to rebuild lost jawbone in the back of the lower jaw. Twenty adults with missing teeth and not enough bone for dental implants received both graft types in different sides of their jaw. The goal was to see which material led to more bone growth and less pain or swelling after 6 months.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Locations
-
Ege University Faculty of Dentistry
Izmir, Bornova, 35040, Turkey (Türkiye)
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.