Sugar showdown: natural vs. refined vs. fake sweeteners – which spikes blood sugar?
NCT ID NCT07194772
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at how drinking beverages with different sweeteners—low-calorie sucralose, refined sugar, or natural fruit juice—affects blood sugar control and gut health in healthy adults. Over three weeks, 42 participants drank one type of sweetened drink daily. Researchers measured blood sugar and insulin responses, as well as changes in gut bacteria and inflammation markers. The goal was to understand real-world effects of common sweeteners on metabolism.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
42 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Mar 2022
- Finished
-
Jun 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 35 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
INCLUSION CRITERIA included : * Ages 18-35 y * Body mass index (BMI) between 18.0 and 34.9 kg/m2 * Waist circumference \< 102cm (men) and \< 88cm (women) * Self-reported stable weight during the prior 6 months (+ or - 2kg) of beginning the study. Additional Considerations related to the menstrual cycle and the use of hormonal contraceptives : All women who participated in this study were premenopausal. Recognizing the crucial importance of including women in our study while ensuring the highest quality data, additional considerations were applied to meet inclusion criteria: * Women using no form of hormonal contraception or using copper intrauterine device (IUD) required to report having a regular menstrual cycle to be included * Women using anovulants (birth control pills) were advised to take their daily anovulant continuously for a period of 28 days to ensure stable hormone levels throughout the study (informed consent was obtained). Oral contraceptives release a low and stable daily amount of progestins, which were reported to have minor or no effects on glycemic responses of pre-menopausal women in a recent meta-analysis (Silva-Bermudez 2020). * Women using hormonal contraception such as hormonal IUD and subdermal contraceptive implant were included regardless of their menstrual cycle. Like anovulants, hormonal IUD release a low and stable amount of a progestin (levonorgestrel) into the uterus, therefore preventing periodic fluctuations in hormonal levels during the menstrual cycle. Since Levonorgestrel was included as one of the progestins in the aforementioned meta-analysis, it was therefore assumed that HIUD would also not have a significant impact on glycemic responses, especially as its effect is local rather than systemic; Women using medroxyprogesterone acetate injections (Depo-Provera shot) were excluded given the pro-inflammatory effects associated with high doses of progestin * Women experiencing pregnancy or lactation were excluded. EXCLUSION CRITERIA consisted of : * Prediabetes (fasting glucose ≥ 6.1 mmol/L) * diabetes (fasting glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L) * hypertension (\> 140/90 mmHg) * Reported medical history for dyslipidemias (including hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia) * Surgery for weight loss * Individuals who smoke tobacco (including vaping), habitually ingest \>2 alcoholic beverages/day and/or use cannabis or cannabis-derived products \>1 time/month * Individuals who exercise \>3.5 h/week at a level more vigorous than walking * Individuals who use thyroid, lipid-lowering, glucose-lowering, antihypertensive, antidepressant/antianxiety, antibiotics in the prior 3 months or weight-loss medications * Individuals susceptible to exhibit clinically relevant levels of food cravings as indicated by a score \> 50 on the Food Cravings Questionnaire - Trait reduced (FCQ-T-r)36. FCQ-T-r (15 items) is a validated questionnaire37 that assesses four factors: (1) preoccupation with food (i.e., obsessive thought about food and eating), (2) loss of control (i.e., difficulty regulating eating behavior when exposed to food cues), (3) positive outcome expectancy (i.e., believing eating to be positively reinforcing), and (4) emotional craving (i.e., tending to crave food when experiencing negative emotion).
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Glucose and insulin response are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Behavioural and Metabolic Research Unit, School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa
Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 5S9, Canada
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could gut bacteria predict lung trouble after surgery?
- Hidden in the gut: scientists hunt the everyday exposures behind Drug-Resistant bacteria
- Insulin may quiet the immune alarm tied to heart disease
- Gut bacteria eyed as hidden link between obesity and chronic infections
- Can one workout change your gut bacteria?
- Could mimicking the body's natural insulin pulses improve diabetes testing?