Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Sugar showdown: natural vs. refined vs. fake sweeteners – which spikes blood sugar?

NCT ID NCT07194772

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study looked at how drinking beverages with different sweeteners—low-calorie sucralose, refined sugar, or natural fruit juice—affects blood sugar control and gut health in healthy adults. Over three weeks, 42 participants drank one type of sweetened drink daily. Researchers measured blood sugar and insulin responses, as well as changes in gut bacteria and inflammation markers. The goal was to understand real-world effects of common sweeteners on metabolism.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

42 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Mar 2022

Finished

Jun 2024

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 35 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

INCLUSION CRITERIA included : * Ages 18-35 y * Body mass index (BMI) between 18.0 and 34.9 kg/m2 * Waist circumference \< 102cm (men) and \< 88cm (women) * Self-reported stable weight during the prior 6 months (+ or - 2kg) of beginning the study. Additional Considerations related to the menstrual cycle and the use of hormonal contraceptives : All women who participated in this study were premenopausal. Recognizing the crucial importance of including women in our study while ensuring the highest quality data, additional considerations were applied to meet inclusion criteria: * Women using no form of hormonal contraception or using copper intrauterine device (IUD) required to report having a regular menstrual cycle to be included * Women using anovulants (birth control pills) were advised to take their daily anovulant continuously for a period of 28 days to ensure stable hormone levels throughout the study (informed consent was obtained). Oral contraceptives release a low and stable daily amount of progestins, which were reported to have minor or no effects on glycemic responses of pre-menopausal women in a recent meta-analysis (Silva-Bermudez 2020). * Women using hormonal contraception such as hormonal IUD and subdermal contraceptive implant were included regardless of their menstrual cycle. Like anovulants, hormonal IUD release a low and stable amount of a progestin (levonorgestrel) into the uterus, therefore preventing periodic fluctuations in hormonal levels during the menstrual cycle. Since Levonorgestrel was included as one of the progestins in the aforementioned meta-analysis, it was therefore assumed that HIUD would also not have a significant impact on glycemic responses, especially as its effect is local rather than systemic; Women using medroxyprogesterone acetate injections (Depo-Provera shot) were excluded given the pro-inflammatory effects associated with high doses of progestin * Women experiencing pregnancy or lactation were excluded. EXCLUSION CRITERIA consisted of : * Prediabetes (fasting glucose ≥ 6.1 mmol/L) * diabetes (fasting glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L) * hypertension (\> 140/90 mmHg) * Reported medical history for dyslipidemias (including hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia) * Surgery for weight loss * Individuals who smoke tobacco (including vaping), habitually ingest \>2 alcoholic beverages/day and/or use cannabis or cannabis-derived products \>1 time/month * Individuals who exercise \>3.5 h/week at a level more vigorous than walking * Individuals who use thyroid, lipid-lowering, glucose-lowering, antihypertensive, antidepressant/antianxiety, antibiotics in the prior 3 months or weight-loss medications * Individuals susceptible to exhibit clinically relevant levels of food cravings as indicated by a score \> 50 on the Food Cravings Questionnaire - Trait reduced (FCQ-T-r)36. FCQ-T-r (15 items) is a validated questionnaire37 that assesses four factors: (1) preoccupation with food (i.e., obsessive thought about food and eating), (2) loss of control (i.e., difficulty regulating eating behavior when exposed to food cues), (3) positive outcome expectancy (i.e., believing eating to be positively reinforcing), and (4) emotional craving (i.e., tending to crave food when experiencing negative emotion).

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Glucose and insulin response are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

glucose intolerance Insulin Resistance

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Behavioural and Metabolic Research Unit, School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 5S9, Canada

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.