Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Stitches vs mesh: which is better for hernia repair?

NCT ID NCT05599750

Disease control Sponsor: Clayton Petro Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two surgical methods for fixing incisional hernias (2-6 cm wide): using stitches alone or using mesh. The goal is to see if stitches work just as well as mesh for quality of life one year after surgery. About 154 adults who have had a prior hernia repair without mesh will take part.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Incisional hernia repair (surgery)
What this could lead to
If suture repair works as well as mesh, patients could avoid the risks and costs of mesh implants while still getting good results.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage trial (154 people) comparing two surgical techniques. Results may not apply to larger hernias or emergency cases, and suture repair might not hold up as well over time.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 154 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Nov 2022

Expected to finish

Oct 2031

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Adults \>18 years old. * Anticipated hernia defect 2-6cm in width * Non-emergent case * CDC class I * Patients who previously underwent primary ventral hernia repair without the use of mesh * Incisional hernia Exclusion Criteria: * Emergent cases * Patients \< 18 years old * Patients who are pregnant * Patients who previously underwent a prior ventral hernia repair with mesh at the site of the intended repair. Abdominal mesh in separate locations would be allowed. * Ventral hernia \<2cm or \> 6 cm in width * Primary hernia * CDC wound class II-IV

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Incisional hernia are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Incisional Hernia

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Incisional hernia

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    5 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Cleveland Clinic Main Campus

    RECRUITING

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

  • Northwestern

    RECRUITING

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States

  • University of Florida

    RECRUITING

    Gainesville, Florida, 32611, United States

  • Vanderbilt University

    RECRUITING

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.