Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Stroke showdown: which clot removal method saves more brain?

NCT ID NCT07555977

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Sep 03, 2026 · Updated 4 times

Summary

This study compares two methods to remove large blood clots from the brain during a stroke: using a super large suction catheter versus a stent retriever. About 708 adults with acute ischemic stroke will be randomly assigned to one of the two techniques. The goal is to see which approach leads to better recovery and less disability three months after the procedure.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 708 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Sep 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Mar 2028

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age ≥ 18 years; 2. Clinically diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke, and pre-procedure imaging confirms that the culprit vessel is occlusion of the intracranial segment of the internal carotid artery and/or the middle cerebral artery M1 segment; 3. Pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1; 4. Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥ 6; 5. Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) ≥ 3; 6. Time from symptom onset to initiation of endovascular treatment (arterial puncture) \< 24 hours; symptom onset time is defined as the "last known well" time; 7. Intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy are performed according to local guidelines, and intravenous thrombolysis does not delay mechanical thrombectomy; 8. Written informed consent is obtained from the patient or a family member. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Imaging shows acute or subacute intracranial hemorrhage (excluding microbleeds); 2. Imaging indicates an intracranial tumor (excluding meningiomas \<2 cm in diameter) or mass effect caused by a tumor, such as midline shift; 3. Cerebral embolism caused by infection or bacterial endocarditis; 4. The culprit vessel lesion is considered to be chronic atherosclerotic stenosis and occlusion; 5. Pre-procedure imaging suggests that the lesion is due to dissection; 6. Previous intracranial aneurysm or vascular malformation in the culprit vessel; 7. Presence of a life-threatening illness within 6 months that would prevent 3-month follow-up; 8. Pregnancy, psychiatric illness, severe hepatic or renal insufficiency, severe heart failure; 9. Concurrent participation in another clinical drug or device study; 10. Metastatic tumor; 11. Systemic infection; 12. Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the patient unsuitable for participation in this study.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute ischemic stroke are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  2. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.