Stroke showdown: which clot removal method saves more brain?
NCT ID NCT07555977
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Sep 03, 2026 · Updated 4 times
Summary
This study compares two methods to remove large blood clots from the brain during a stroke: using a super large suction catheter versus a stent retriever. About 708 adults with acute ischemic stroke will be randomly assigned to one of the two techniques. The goal is to see which approach leads to better recovery and less disability three months after the procedure.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 708 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Sep 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Mar 2028
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age ≥ 18 years; 2. Clinically diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke, and pre-procedure imaging confirms that the culprit vessel is occlusion of the intracranial segment of the internal carotid artery and/or the middle cerebral artery M1 segment; 3. Pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1; 4. Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥ 6; 5. Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) ≥ 3; 6. Time from symptom onset to initiation of endovascular treatment (arterial puncture) \< 24 hours; symptom onset time is defined as the "last known well" time; 7. Intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy are performed according to local guidelines, and intravenous thrombolysis does not delay mechanical thrombectomy; 8. Written informed consent is obtained from the patient or a family member. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Imaging shows acute or subacute intracranial hemorrhage (excluding microbleeds); 2. Imaging indicates an intracranial tumor (excluding meningiomas \<2 cm in diameter) or mass effect caused by a tumor, such as midline shift; 3. Cerebral embolism caused by infection or bacterial endocarditis; 4. The culprit vessel lesion is considered to be chronic atherosclerotic stenosis and occlusion; 5. Pre-procedure imaging suggests that the lesion is due to dissection; 6. Previous intracranial aneurysm or vascular malformation in the culprit vessel; 7. Presence of a life-threatening illness within 6 months that would prevent 3-month follow-up; 8. Pregnancy, psychiatric illness, severe hepatic or renal insufficiency, severe heart failure; 9. Concurrent participation in another clinical drug or device study; 10. Metastatic tumor; 11. Systemic infection; 12. Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the patient unsuitable for participation in this study.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute ischemic stroke are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can PET scans reveal hidden heart inflammation after a stroke?
- Can an implanted heart monitor catch hidden irregular heartbeats after stroke?
- China builds national watchdog for brain blood vessel devices
- Can tiny neural exosomes help the brain heal after a severe stroke?
- Can a new antibody boost recovery after severe stroke?
- After stroke, a balloon or a stent? trial tests which rescue opens blocked brain arteries better