New study hopes to predict dangerous low blood sugar in type 1 diabetes
NCT ID NCT05616273
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looked at 62 people with type 1 diabetes to see if a test that measures the hormone glucagon can predict the risk of dangerously low blood sugar (hypoglycemia). Participants drank a special liquid meal or received an arginine injection to stimulate glucagon release, and their blood sugar levels were tracked. The goal is to develop a simple blood test that could help doctors identify those at highest risk for hypoglycemia and improve their care.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could lead to a simple blood test to predict hypoglycemia risk in people with type 1 diabetes, helping doctors tailor care.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small observational study, not a treatment trial. The findings may not translate into a reliable clinical test or benefit all patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
62 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
May 2023
- Finished
-
Sep 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
75 individuals with long duration T1D, identified from participation in the TIGI study (UK IRAS ID: 141756, REC Number: 13/SW/0312), with consent to be contacted for future research. The TIGI participants have a clinical diagnosis of T1D, were on insulin from diagnosis and, if BMI was \>30, were autoantibody positive. We will aim to recruit 50 people with undetectable C-peptide and 25 with detectable C-peptide. The selection of people with absent C-peptide allows a secondary analysis focussed on stimulated glucagon without any potential interaction with endogenous insulin secretion. It also focusses on a group of people known to be at high hypoglycaemia risk due to lack of endogenous insulin.
- Ages
-
16 to 65 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Clinical diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes * Insulin treated * Known urine C-peptide status (using Urinary C-Peptide Creatinine Ratio \[UCPCR\], positive/negative defined by UCPCR 0.2nmol/mmol cut-off) * Age 16-65 years inclusive * Able and willing to provide informed consent/assent. Exclusion Criteria: * Age less than 16 year or over 65 years * Pregnant or lactating (as this may limit blood sampling and affect T cell function) * Any medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would affect the safety of the subject's participation, or validity of results.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Hypoglycemia are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW, United Kingdom
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can skin sensors replace finger pricks for diabetes care in kenya?
- Brain scans may predict who is most at risk for dangerous low blood sugar
- Tiny horses, big lessons: can ponies help kids tame diabetes?
- Can a math model tune insulin pumps better than standard care?
- Mapping the hormone behind Post-Surgery blood sugar crashes
- Can a group program stop eating disorders in type 1 diabetes?