Hand vs. wrist: which route is better for heart scans?
NCT ID NCT05725616
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at two methods for performing coronary angiography, a procedure that takes pictures of the heart's blood vessels. The standard method goes through an artery at the wrist, while the newer method uses an artery in the back of the hand (called the snuff box). The goal was to see if the snuff box approach works just as well as the wrist approach. The study included 326 adults scheduled for a diagnostic heart scan.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
326 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jul 2023
- Finished
-
Jan 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patient, male or female, aged 18 and over * Patient having a diagnostic coronary angiography programmed by radial route. * Patient with a radial pulse at the anatomical snuff box and at the wrist noticeable Exclusion Criteria: * Patient requiring emergency coronary angiography or having an acute coronary syndrome * Patient with severe arteriopathy of the supra-aortic trunks * Patient with a history of coronary bypass surgery * Tall patients (\>1.90m) * Patient allergic to xylocaine * Patient presenting a contraindication to the realization of a coronary angiography: terminal IRC, pregnancy, severe sepsis....
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Coronary angiography are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Cardiologie Tonkin
Villeurbanne, 69100, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a Sea-Shell pad replace the sandbag after heart procedures?
- Hypnosis may calm nerves during heart procedure, study finds
- Early walking after heart procedure may be safe and more comfortable
- Simple cuff trick may shield heart failure patients from kidney damage
- Heart scans may reveal hidden health surprises
- Timing of blood thinner injection could prevent artery blockage after heart procedure