Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Heart test showdown: invasive vs Non-Invasive – which is better for mild blockages?

NCT ID NCT05799092

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two ways to check heart arteries after a CT scan shows non-severe blockages: an invasive angiogram (a tube in the artery) versus standard non-invasive tests (like stress tests). About 2,000 people with chest pain or related symptoms will be randomly assigned to one approach. The goal is to see which strategy better prevents heart attacks, deaths, or the need for unplanned procedures.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If this trial shows that non-invasive testing is as good or better than invasive angiography, it could change standard practice, sparing many patients from unnecessary procedures.
What could go wrong
This is a diagnostic strategy trial, not a treatment study. The results may not apply to higher-risk patients, and the open-label design could introduce bias.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 2,000 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Oct 2023

Expected to finish

Dec 2030

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

19 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Subject age ≥19 years old 2. Patients with new or worsening chest pain syndrome, equivalent symptoms, or abnormal laboratory test findings (suspected ischemic changes in electrocardiography, regional wall motion abnormality in echocardiography, or coronary calcium score \> 100) suspected for clinically significant CAD who are evaluated by CCTA 3. Any other clinical circumstance in which physician judged to proceed CCTA 4. Obstructive CAD in CCTA (≥50% diameter stenosis) 5. Subject who can verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits, and treatment alternatives of receiving invasive approach and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any study related procedure. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Diagnosed or suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring hospitalization or urgent or emergent testing (elevated cardiac troponin or CK-MB) 2. High risk CAD (left main stenosis ≥ 50%; anatomically significant 3-vessel disease with ≥70% stenosis) 3. Hemodynamically or clinically unstable condition (systolic BP \< 90 mmHg, ventricular arrhythmias, or persistent resting chest pain in ischemic nature despite adequate therapy 4. Known CAD with previous MI, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) 5. Known true anaphylaxis to contrast medium (not allergic reaction but anaphylactic shock) 6. Known significant congenital, severe valvular or cardiomyopathic (hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy, or any other forms) process which could explain cardiac symptoms. 7. Severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction \<30%) 8. Intolerance to Aspirin, Clopidogrel, or Heparin. 9. Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy \<2 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment) 10. Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Coronary artery disease are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    22 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Ajou University Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Suwon, South Korea

  • Chonnam National University

    RECRUITING

    Gwangju, South Korea

  • Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Gwangmyeong, South Korea

  • Chung-Ang University Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Seoul, South Korea

  • Chungbuk National University Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Chungju, South Korea

  • Chungnam National University Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Daejeon, South Korea

  • Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Seoul, South Korea

  • Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Seoul, South Korea

  • Gachon University Gil Medical Center

    RECRUITING

    Incheon, South Korea

  • Gyeongsang National University Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Jinju, South Korea

  • Hanyang University Seoul Hospital, College of Medicine, Hanyang University

    RECRUITING

    Seoul, South Korea

  • Inje university Ilsan Paik hospital

    RECRUITING

    Ilsan, South Korea

  • Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine

    RECRUITING

    Seoul, South Korea

  • Kangwon National University Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Chuncheon, South Korea

  • Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

    RECRUITING

    Daegu, South Korea

  • Korea University Anam Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Seoul, South Korea

  • Kwandong University Intl. ST. Mary's Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Incheon, South Korea

  • Kyungpook National University Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Daegu, South Korea

  • Samsung Medical Center

    RECRUITING

    Seoul, South Korea

  • Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center

    RECRUITING

    Seoul, South Korea

  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Seongnam-si, South Korea

  • SoonChunHyang University Hospital Bucheon

    RECRUITING

    Bucheon-si, South Korea

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.