Which surgery works best for pelvic organ prolapse? new study compares two techniques
NCT ID NCT06307873
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compared two surgical methods—sacrospinous fixation and v-notes lateral suspension—for treating pelvic organ prolapse in 70 women aged 35-75. Researchers measured how well each surgery restored anatomy and improved quality of life. The goal is to find which approach offers better recovery and fewer complications.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- surgical procedure (sacrospinous fixation or v-notes lateral suspension)
- What this could lead to
- If one technique proves better, it could lead to improved surgical outcomes and quality of life for women with pelvic organ prolapse.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with only 70 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. Surgery always carries risks like infection or recurrence.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
70 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Sep 2023
- Finished
-
Sep 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
A government agency
The lead sponsor is a government body.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
35 to 75 years
- Sex
-
Female participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * patient aged 35-75 patients without pelvic mess, servical or endometrial lesion Exclusion Criteria: * patients with pelvic mess, servical or endometrial lesion patient with diagnosed endometrial cancer
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Genital prolapse, unspecified are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)